Clinical Benchmarks

Lingshu-32B

128K context32BopenCompare with other models

Clinical Benchmarks Index
30.4rank 112 of 148; 52.6 × 0.577 = 30.4, from 1 of 10 boards
Boards
1 of 13
Results
76 on secondary measures
Latest measurement
Aug 2026

Results

Each line is placed on its own board. Dark tick: the board leader.

Safety

  1. MedPIC
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    59.5
    Rank 13 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 80.7
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026

Secondary measures

Safety

  1. MedPIC, Risk deactivation accuracy
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    54.4
    Rank 5 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 77.9
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  2. MedPIC, Counterfactual accuracy (CF)
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    53.0
    Rank 8 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 69.9
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  3. MedPIC, Linked counterfactual pair accuracy
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    25.8
    Rank 9 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 48.3
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  4. MedPIC, Guideline-following accuracy (GF)
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    63.7
    Rank 14 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 87.7
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  5. MedPIC, Risk activation accuracy
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    60.6
    Rank 14 of 28Leader MedGemma-27B-Text 76.1
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  6. MedPIC, Published GF-minus-CF accuracy gap
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    10.7
    Descriptive measure, not ranked
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026

Sources

Open a line for the quote and page.

  1. 13MedPIC zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match 59.5
    Printed as 59.5Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Lingshu-32B, column Overall; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Lingshu-32B | 59.5 | 63.7 | 53.0 | 10.7 | 60.6 | 54.4 | 25.8
    Every result from this document
  2. 14MedPIC, Guideline-following accuracy (GF) zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match 63.7
    Printed as 63.7Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Lingshu-32B, column GF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Lingshu-32B | 59.5 | 63.7 | 53.0 | 10.7 | 60.6 | 54.4 | 25.8
    Every result from this document
  3. 8MedPIC, Counterfactual accuracy (CF) zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match 53.0
    Printed as 53.0Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Lingshu-32B, column CF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Lingshu-32B | 59.5 | 63.7 | 53.0 | 10.7 | 60.6 | 54.4 | 25.8
    Every result from this document
  4. 9MedPIC, Linked counterfactual pair accuracy zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match 25.8
    Printed as 25.8Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Lingshu-32B, column Pair; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Lingshu-32B | 59.5 | 63.7 | 53.0 | 10.7 | 60.6 | 54.4 | 25.8
    Every result from this document
  5. 14MedPIC, Risk activation accuracy zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match 60.6
    Printed as 60.6Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Lingshu-32B, column Activation; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Lingshu-32B | 59.5 | 63.7 | 53.0 | 10.7 | 60.6 | 54.4 | 25.8
    Every result from this document
  6. 5MedPIC, Risk deactivation accuracy zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match 54.4
    Printed as 54.4Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Lingshu-32B, column Deactivation; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Lingshu-32B | 59.5 | 63.7 | 53.0 | 10.7 | 60.6 | 54.4 | 25.8
    Every result from this document
  7. –MedPIC, Published GF-minus-CF accuracy gap zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match 10.7
    Printed as 10.7Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Lingshu-32B, column Δ_GF−CF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Lingshu-32B | 59.5 | 63.7 | 53.0 | 10.7 | 60.6 | 54.4 | 25.8
    Every result from this document

Other Alibaba models: Lingshu-7B, Qwen3-14B, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, Qwen3-32B, Qwen3-4B, Qwen 3.5, Qwen3.5-27B, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Qwen3.5 397B A17B, Qwen3.5-9B, Qwen 3.5 Flash, Qwen3.5-Plus, Qwen3.6-Max, Qwen3.6 Plus, Qwen 3.7 Max, Qwen3.7 Plus, Qwen 3.8 27B, Qwen3.8 Max, Qwen 3 Max Thinking, Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B, Qwen 3 VL Plus